Now that Natalia is 6 months old (yikes!) and beginning
solid food, many people reasonably (?) expect her to start sleeping “through
the night”. However, I’ve been getting
this question almost from the beginning.
There is a very good biological reason why tiny babies need
to feed every few hours, day and night; basically, because the size of their
stomachs only allows them to eat so much at a time. (Here is a great visual that helps show the
difference between a one day old baby’s stomach and a one month old baby’s
stomach: http://babiesfirstlactation.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/the-newborns-stomach/.) As you can imagine, as the baby grows into a
child and then an adult, her stomach grows right along with her.
Therefore, the bigger the person, the more
she can eat at a time. Conversely, the
smaller the person, the less she can eat at a time. And if she can only eat a little bit at a
time, she will naturally need to eat more frequently than a bigger person, who
can fill up and not get hungry for hours. So, since a baby gets hungry once she goes through
her rather small meal, she inevitably will wake up at night when she gets
hungry. Trying to force a young baby to sleep through
the night is ill-advised.
Now, I will say that there are only very few things I enjoy
more than sleeping in. As a melancholic
and a spirited adult, I tend to need more sleep than many others. So you can be sure that adjusting to new
motherhood in terms of sleep deprivation was not something I looked forward to
or had an easy time with. Even so, I do
not consider getting Natalka to sleep through the night as some sort of
milestone that will “finally” allow me to enjoy her more. Of course, when she does finally sleep through the night, it
will be a milestone, and I will be quite happy to no longer have my nightly
sleep interrupted. But I am in no hurry.
First of all, how do we define sleeping “through” the night?
How many hours exactly counts as
sleeping “through” the night? I’ve heard
“six” as the standard, but that hardly qualifies as sleeping through the night
for me, who gets grouchy with much less than 10 hours of sleep. So whether I wake up every four hours or every
six makes little difference, because I’m not getting the optimum stretch of
sleep that I as an individual need anyway. If Natalia is sleeping in six-hour stretches,
how ought I answer the question then?
On the other hand, there are proponents of parenting that
aims to “show baby who’s boss” by ignoring a baby’s cries in an effort to “teach
independence” and hence get the baby to sleep up to 12 hours overnight. It seems that this is an old idea that won’t
die in modern times which many people – parents and non-parents alike – seem to
consider some magical milestone about which to inquire at seemingly every
meeting with a new mom or dad.
Assuming we could agree on how to actually define “sleeping
through the night”, what good would it do for me to answer in the positive? All I can expect is the inquirer to smile and
say “oh, good.” And if I answer in the
negative? It’s not like the inquirer
will then volunteer to take over parts of the night shift for me.
I suppose that fellow parents ask this question simply as an
attempt to find something to bond over with me.
Though if we follow different parenting styles, we may need to look
outside the box for such camaraderie. Mere
artificial milestones won’t do the trick.
I did make this faux-pas a few months ago when I asked a
friend with a son 8 months older than Natalia if he was sleeping "through" the night.
In my case, I was asking because I wondered what was in store for me and
my little one. I suppose it only becomes
a nuisance if a parent is faced with the same question over and over again from
many different people and over an extended period of time.
So let me offer a standing reply for most likely the next 6
months: No, Natalia is not yet sleeping through the night. She wakes up on average every 4 hours,
usually because the urge to pee wakes her up (I know this because her diaper is
dry and she pees on her little potty), and to fill up her still small stomach. As she starts taking in more and more solid
food, I do expect her to start sleeping for longer stretches of time. However, this will come at a price, since less
frequent nursing will lead to a diminished milk supply, and of course eventual
weaning. So don’t assume that I’m
looking forward to a full night’s rest necessarily, as I am fully aware that
each phase of my baby’s life will come with its own pros and cons, and the best
I can do is to focus on the positives and enjoy them to the fullest.
While we’re on the subject of answering reemerging questions:
No, Natalia doesn’t yet have any teeth either. And Yes, we are “still” breastfeeding. (The
World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding for “at least” the first two
years of life, and the American
Academy of Pediatrics
notes that breastmilk [or formula] is to be a baby’s primary source of
nutrition for the entire first year of life.)